Skip to main content

Plato's Theory of Justice - The Republic- exam notes

 

Plato's Theory of Justice

 Plato's Methodology


  1. Concerning Justice - 
    • It follows the style of dialogue between Socrates and his pupils (Sophists).
    • Socrates compiles the answers of Sophist to his questions and demolishes them one by one. Ultimately, he offers his own answer. This embodies the Plato's theory of justice. 

    2. Dialectical Method - 

    • Introduced by Socrates himself.
    • It employs the technique of undertaking a thorough examination of though from different schools and bringing forth inconsistencies, contradictions and shortcomings with a view to arrive at a tenable (logical/rational) position.
    • Contradictory ideas clash they destroy each other's untenable parts and only truth is left behind. 
    • Clashes of 'thesis' (initial ideas) and 'antithesis' (opposite ideas) give birth to 'synthesis'.
    3. Analogies - 
    • It is the style of referring to simple and familiar things in order to explain the complex and unfamiliar things
    • Plato uses analogies of craftsman and physician in dealing with the problems of administration. He says, only trained person will serve our purpose, for instance, only a qualified physician, and not a most handsome or eloquent one, can treat our illness. 
    4. Teleological Method -
    • This method involves determining the nature of things with reference to the final cause or ultimate purpose for which they exist. 
    • Only by identifying and analyzing the psychology, capacity, field of interest and nature of man an 'ideal state' (Utopia or perfect society) can be created.
The Quest For Justice 

    Plato believes that human survival requires organization of a state or society because man cannot exist independently (Greeks did not distinguish between state and society). Along with survival, humans seek the means of good life, which in turn arises the requirement of justice in society or state.
    The quest for justice is reflected in the discussion between Socrates on the one side and Cephalus (a wealthy aristocrat), Glaucon, Adeimantus and Thrasymachus on the other side. Their discussion on what justice is are summarized as bellow - 
Socrates discards all and offers his own answer. He says - 
  1. Government is an art. Its prominent aim is the well-being of its clients (subjects), and not to earn profit for itself. He gives analogy of a physician. The true function of a physician is to cure a patient, and not to make money. 
  2. When weak majority suffers unduly, it enters into contract among itself not to harm one another. In this way, laws are born and justice is done to all in the society or state.
 Nature of justice 
     Justice is relation among individual in their respective states. According to Plato, nature of justice in society or state changes with the nature of its residents in the following ways - 
  • Communism - State with simple men requires communism form of govt. 
  • Aristocracy - State with the men who are acquisitive, ambitious, competitive and jealous requires aristocracy form of govt.
  • Democracy - Due to class division between rich and poor, there is class conflict between them. Rich class forms Plutocracy or Oligarchy form of govt. on the basis of their power of wealth. But, soon the poor class revolt against the rich and democracy replaces oligarchy. 
  • Tyranny - Those assuming power are soon trapped by hunger for money. Calling themselves the 'protector of the people' they rise to supreme power - tyranny of autocracy. 
  • Choosing the best ruler - Just like people choose meticulously there day to day needs, in they same way, they should elect the best and most qualified person as their ruler. Plato lament, unfortunately they are misled by demagogues. 
  • Different duties for different classes of citizens. Plato suggests that -
    • people with desiring, acquisitive, and restless traits are fit for trade and industry.
    • people with emotion and spirit are fit to work as solders.
    • people with knowledge and learning are fit for ruling the society.
  • Four cardinal virtues of justice - 
    • Temperance - befitting the traders class
    • Courage - befitting the soldiers class
    • Wisdom - befitting the philosopher class
    • Justice - befitting the state or whole social order.
True justice is arrived at only when these four virtues work in harmony with each other. Plato's theory of justice has been described as Architectonic Theory of Justice. Giving an analogy of a building Plato says that different parts of a building are designed differently by different artisans, but an architect combine them so nicely that these parts strengthen one another and give a look of a grandeur building together. in the same way, different cardinal virtues are held by different people but they are combined by Justice. 
The Pala Dynasty (750 AD – 1150 AD)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Kushans: Extent of Empire, Regilious Policy, Development of Art, Architecture and Literature

  The Kushans (1st century CE to 3rd centrury CE) Also called Yuechis or Tocharians , the Kushans were nomadic people from the steppes of north Central Asia .  They first occupied Bactria or north Afghanistan where they displaced the Sakas .  They moved to Kabul valley and captured Gandhara by crossing the Hindu Kush . Here, they replaced Greeks and Parthians.  They eventually established their authority over the lower Indus basin and the greater part of the Gangetic basin . The Kushan empire in India was known as the Central Asian Empire . There were two successive dynasties Kushans - the first was founded by house of chiefs who were called Kadphises, and the second was founded by Kanishka.   Kushan ruler - Kadphises-I issued gold coins in the south of the Hindu Kush , while the second ruler Kadphises-II issued gold coins and spread his kingdom to the east of the Indus. Kanishka was the first famous Kushan ruler . Kanishka is known for two reasons -  first - he started an era called

The Lichchavi Kingdom (C 450 CE to C 750 CE)

About The Licchavi Kingdom The Lichchavis were the most powerful of the eight clans of Vajji janapad . Their capital was at Vaishali (Bihar).  They were an Indo-Aryan tribe who conquered the territory of the Maha-Videha kingdom and temporarily occupied the Videha capital of Mithila . Given to rising power of Magadha empire , Lichchavis established their republic in the southern part of Maha-Videha kingdom until the marginal location of Vaishali , which was their largest city and capital. To the south of Vaishali was situated the kingdom of Magadha with which relations of Vaishali were initially good. Chellana , the Lichchavi princes from Vaishali was married to Magadha king Bimbisara . Chellana was the second wife of Bimbisara. She gave birth to Ajatshatru , who did not care about relations and invaded and annexed Vaishali in Magadha empire. Republican Constitution of The Lichchavis According to Panini , the janapadas (territorial states) were generally headed by ekraja or one ki

The Gupta Empire (319 AD - 540 AD): Extension of the Empire; Development of Language and Literature; Art and Architecture.

 The Gupta Empire (319 AD - 540 AD) Gupta empire emerged on the ruins of the Kushan kingdom.  The empire orginated in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh and expanded in almost whole India excluding interior south and Kashmir.  Prayag was the nerve centre of their administration.  They were originally Vaishyas . The founder of the Gupta empire was Srigupta .  The empire witnessed three most important rulers - Chandragupta-I, Samudragupta and Chandragupta-II .  Extent of the Empire Three Gupta rulers  Chandragupta-I, Samudragupta snd Chandragupta-II Contributed the most to the expansion of the empire. Chandragupta I (AD 319 - 334) Marriage alliance was the tool of Chandragupta I for expansion of the empire. He married a Lichchavi princess from Nepal and strengthened his position. Since he married in a higher clan of kshatriya, he earned prestige.  Samudragupta (AD 335-380) He is given credit for the most of expansions of the empire.  Samudragupta was given the title Napolian of India . Oppos