Skip to main content

Critical Appraisal of Plato's Theory of Justice - short notes


 Critical Appraisal of Plato's Theory of Justice

 

The focal point of Plato's Theory of Justice is the 'moral foundation of politics'. He was the greatest political philosopher of the time. He had envisaged an ideal state ruled by 'philosopher king'. In order to prepare a philosopher king he suggested his education system. And in order to make the ideal state he suggested a different style of living for the 'guardian class'. But, in modern world his ideas do not look fit because of the following reasons - 

  1. Dilemma of dominance - 
  • Plato suggests division of social class on the basis of predominance of components of human nature - Desire, Emotion and Knowledge. He suggests that a person predominant with 'Desire or Temperance' is fit for 'trade and commerce', a person predominant with 'Emotion or Courage' is fit to become a 'soldier', and a person predominant with 'Knowledge' is fit to rule the state. But, in today's world, Plato idea does not fit for a number of reasons. First being the most of countries across the world are democratic today, and they promote 'equality of opportunity' among their citizens. A person from any walk of life, any social class, can become a ruler today. Only on the basis of knowledge one cannot become ruler. A person is to become a ruler is expected to have emotion, courage, knowledge, and so on. A person merely with knowledge cannot rule if he has no courage or emotion to take stringent decisions. He cannot defend his nation or state from external aggression. A person merely with knowledge, and devoid of will power cannot uplift the poor mass of his state. 

    2. Lack of confidence in society - 

  • Plato's idea of 'Communism of Property and Wives' is nothing but ridiculous in modern days. In this, Plato suggests for the 'guardian class' that there should be private wife and children. Rather, wives and husbands should be common, and children born of them will be put in the custody of the state, which will educate and nurtured by the sate so that they could be rendered into the state service. Furthermore, Plato suggests that property of the guardian class should be not be private ones. They will be surrendered to the state. The guardian class will have only as much property as is required for survival. These steps, according to Plato, will end corruption and there will be an ideal state in place.
    3. Unrealistic - 
  • His conservative disciple, Aristotle, severely criticizes Plato for his bold decisions. Plato treated women on par with men to join the ranks of guardian class. Women had equal right of education as men. Aristotle terms it 'unrealistic'. 
    4. Totalitarian - 
    • Critics, like Karl Popper, call Plato a 'totalitarian'. Totalitarianism refers to a political outlook which upholds supreme authority of the state over all aspects of the life of its citizens. A totalitarian state tends to direct all political, economic, social-cultural and intellectual activities of people towards fulfilling certain aims which are determined by the state itself. Totalitarianism is antagonist of Democracy where no one has freedom of choice. But, our appraisal should not be based on what critics said about Plato. We should delve into the circumstances of the contemporary society. Plato's idea of justice, outlined in his Republic, was based on reason and understanding which was the requirement of the time. Therefore, it would not be fair to call him or his idea totalitarian.  
    Plato's ideal state was ruled by philosopher king. He wanted to establish a welfare state where the state fulfills the requirements of it subjects. But, the way he chose was different from that of modern days. He has his own education system, and 'communism of property and wives' to produce philosopher kings to rule the state. The system was perhaps the requirement of the society in the ancient Greek. Just as modern world leaders struggle to establish corruption free state, in the same way, Plato also has idea based on reasons, logic and understanding which makes him the first political philosopher.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Kushans: Extent of Empire, Regilious Policy, Development of Art, Architecture and Literature

  The Kushans (1st century CE to 3rd centrury CE) Also called Yuechis or Tocharians , the Kushans were nomadic people from the steppes of north Central Asia .  They first occupied Bactria or north Afghanistan where they displaced the Sakas .  They moved to Kabul valley and captured Gandhara by crossing the Hindu Kush . Here, they replaced Greeks and Parthians.  They eventually established their authority over the lower Indus basin and the greater part of the Gangetic basin . The Kushan empire in India was known as the Central Asian Empire . There were two successive dynasties Kushans - the first was founded by house of chiefs who were called Kadphises, and the second was founded by Kanishka.   Kushan ruler - Kadphises-I issued gold coins in the south of the Hindu Kush , while the second ruler Kadphises-II issued gold coins and spread his kingdom to the east of the Indus. Kanishka was the first famous Kushan ruler . Kanishka is known for two reasons -...

The Lichchavi Kingdom (C 450 CE to C 750 CE)

About The Licchavi Kingdom The Lichchavis were the most powerful of the eight clans of Vajji janapad . Their capital was at Vaishali (Bihar).  They were an Indo-Aryan tribe who conquered the territory of the Maha-Videha kingdom and temporarily occupied the Videha capital of Mithila . Given to rising power of Magadha empire , Lichchavis established their republic in the southern part of Maha-Videha kingdom until the marginal location of Vaishali , which was their largest city and capital. To the south of Vaishali was situated the kingdom of Magadha with which relations of Vaishali were initially good. Chellana , the Lichchavi princes from Vaishali was married to Magadha king Bimbisara . Chellana was the second wife of Bimbisara. She gave birth to Ajatshatru , who did not care about relations and invaded and annexed Vaishali in Magadha empire. Republican Constitution of The Lichchavis According to Panini , the janapadas (territorial states) were generally headed by ekraja or on...

The Gupta Empire (319 AD - 540 AD): Extension of the Empire; Development of Language and Literature; Art and Architecture.

 The Gupta Empire (319 AD - 540 AD) Gupta empire emerged on the ruins of the Kushan kingdom.  The empire orginated in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh and expanded in almost whole India excluding interior south and Kashmir.  Prayag was the nerve centre of their administration.  They were originally Vaishyas . The founder of the Gupta empire was Srigupta .  The empire witnessed three most important rulers - Chandragupta-I, Samudragupta and Chandragupta-II .  Extent of the Empire Three Gupta rulers  Chandragupta-I, Samudragupta snd Chandragupta-II Contributed the most to the expansion of the empire. Chandragupta I (AD 319 - 334) Marriage alliance was the tool of Chandragupta I for expansion of the empire. He married a Lichchavi princess from Nepal and strengthened his position. Since he married in a higher clan of kshatriya, he earned prestige.  Samudragupta (AD 335-380) He is given credit for the most of expansions of the empire.  Samudragupta w...